Purchase Reverse Mortgage, Sellers and Builders Need Education

Michael Branson (CEO ARMC)     3/20/09 7:10pm

HUD put out a Mortgagee Letter in October of 2008 in which they outlined a method by which they were going to calculate benefits under the purchase reverse mortgage program.  Later, they indicated that they were going to further clarify that Mortgagee Letter and the HUD Website does in fact clarify the fact that HUD will use the lesser of the Principal Lending Limit, the Appraised Value or the Sales Price to determine the borrowers’ benefits under the HECM for Purchase program, even though the Mortgagee Letter has yet to be released.  However, there is a purchase program available today utilizing the more strict interpretation that many lenders and builders have virtually eliminated from the realm of possibility when selling their new homes or real estate owned, simply due to the lack of education!

I know that there are those reading now that are saying to themselves, there is no way in today’s market that any builder would miss out on legitimate sales.  But we have had two instances of it already and solely due to the builder not being aware of the manner in which the purchase reverse mortgage works and their desire, for whatever reason, to direct all business through their in-house lender. 

One of our borrowers asked us to contact the sales office on his behalf and we gladly did so. To our surprise, they told us the same thing, that if the borrower could not be approved through their in-house lender, they would not accept an offer.  We offered to go to the tract, to the builder or to whomever they wished and explain the HUD program to them and why this or any senior borrower’s offer who qualified was valid and it was to their benefit to accept his full-price offer.  They declined our offer. 

Now there can only be one of a relatively few reasons why a builder would not want to sell his home to a qualified senior borrower who wants to utilize a reverse mortgage:

  1. He didn’t really want to sell the house in the first place;
  2. He did not want to lose the income he would make on the loan from his in-house lender;
  3. There was too much fear of the unknown

I have to rule out #1.  Most builders build their homes to sell them.  There is a carrying cost for every month the completed home stays in inventory and I have never met a builder yet who just decided not to sell the homes in his tract to his own detriment.

#2 is out for the simple fact that the builder told the borrower that he could get his own lender as well as also apply with the builders’ in-house lender.  He said the borrower was free to go with his own lender, provided his lender could also approve the purchaser.  Then they would know they had a bona-fide purchaser.

That leaves us with #3.  There was too much fear of the unknown and the only way to alleviate those fears is with education.  For instance, builders want to be sure they have a real buyer and that there won’t be surprises down the road.  Most aren’t aware that with the HUD/FHA HECM for purchase program, there is no income and almost no credit qualification.

It is quick and easy to determine if the borrower has the necessary down payment requirement by running the Purchase Reverse Mortgage Calculator and looking at the borrower’s bank statements. A quick credit report determines that the borrower is not in bankruptcy and after that, there is no later concern that the borrower may lose his job, that ratios may not be in line, that the underwriter may not like an explanation for a credit item, etc.  That just doesn’t happen on reverse mortgages. 

These builders are already selling their homes with FHA financing so they had already been seeing FHA appraisals and under the HECM for purchase program, there can be no builder concessions.  This is another reason builders should be jumping up and down to sell to these borrowers utilizing these loans.

We had a similar situation on a property owned by a bank but when we did a presentation for the bank, they jumped at the opportunity to sell to the senior borrower.  They made the decision there and then to amend their policy that purchasers had to also be bank approved, unless purchasing with a reverse mortgage.

No concessions, borrowers who are almost automatically approved providing they are aged 62 or over and meet the most miniscule requirements and have a substantial down payment - these are the types of borrowers every builder should be praying for.  With just a little education and an open mind, senior HECM for Purchase borrowers could be the builder’s best friend!

purchase with a reverse mortgage: banner

Purchase Reverse Mortgage Quote / Questions?

Call (888) 801-2762 Ext. 1 or complete our online




3 Comment(s)
ED
3/24/09 1:14pm
Your assertions to determing the Principal Loan (PL) limit is incorrect. PL deprives from the lessor of: 1) Sales Price, 2) Appraised Value, or 3) Maximum FHA County Limits
Michael Branson
3/24/09 5:34pm
The HECM program dropped county by county limits with the passage of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008. With the signature of HR 3221 on July 30th and more specifically the issuance of Mortgagee Letter 2008-35, a single national limit of $417,000 replaced the county by county limits that HUD previously utilized on November 6, 2008 in all but a few high cost areas of Alaska, Guam, Hawaii and the Virgin Islands. However, with the signing of the American Recovery and Reinvestment

Act of 2009 and the subsequent issuance of Mortgagee Letter 2009-07 dated February 24, 2009, a single national limit of $625,500 has been established for the HECM program until December 31, 2009. If there has been no vote to extend the temporary increase, the limits will revert back to those established in Mortgagee Letter 2008-35. Either way, with just a couple exceptions, there are no county by county limits with the HECM program since the passage of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.

However it is interesting to note that HUD has removed their link to the clarification of the purchase program that we first reported and to which we linked. I had intended to link it back to this response once again so that readers could see HUD's own statements as we did with our first article, "Appraised Value for Purchase Reverse Mortgages...HUD Answers" since they had actually used this very wording in their website. However, they have since removed the link which contained the clarification. HUD has still not issued a Mortgagee Letter to clarify or rescind the 2008-33 Mortgagee Letter and now the only page on which they did clarify that they would use the lower of the HUD Lending Limit, the appraised value or the sales price can no longer be accessed.

maurice
3/24/09 8:33pm
Greetings from New Zealand !! Just getting my head around your case studies for moving house -In the example for John and Sue Ages are they raising the $140000 deposit on home B bt taking out a RM on house A then transferring the whole package to house B when house A sells ?? If that is the case how can they have up to $260000 left to spend on health care or whatever ? That plus the deposit equals the total value of house B [$400000] . Can you get a 100% LVR loan in the USA Would be great to hear from you !! Chers MAURICE



Post your comment
Name
Email
Website